Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 121 - 140
of 9,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:43 am
After filing the trademark application, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner claimed that it should be denied registration because the trademark was likely to be confused with the trademark registration for “V P VICTORY INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE” (and design) used in connection with chiropractic services. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on March 23, 1926. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
Spognardi Chicago Partner Mark Spognardi is the planning chair for tomorrow’s ALI-ABA teleseminar Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:33 pm
Doe and Immigration Law in the United States November 4, 2022 About the Symposium On Friday, November 4, 2022, the St. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 228 (U.S. 1980). [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm
The district court held that Stauffer did lack standing to assert a false marking claim because he had not sufficiently alleged an injury in fact to the United States or to himself. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
United States</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 11:33 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Marks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:39 pm
Unique Product Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:04 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States... [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:01 am
Recently, a defendant in a false marking case pending before the Western District of Pennsylvania (FLFMC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:43 pm
To discuss the case, we have Mark H. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
" Simonian v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am
The committee said it was clear, to it, that “the 14th amendment to the Constitution has no effect whatever upon the status of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States,” but that “straggling Indians” were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
