Search for: "United States v. ONE ARTICLE OF DEVICE, ETC."
Results 121 - 140
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
The Commission first determined that the ALJ’s invalidity analysis for the ‘647 patent erroneously relied upon the ‘647 patent’s alleged use of the term “structure,” rather than an agreed-upon construction by the parties, namely, “an instance of a pattern, where a ‘pattern refers to data, such as grammar, regular expression, string, etc., used by a pattern analysis unit to recognize information in a document, such as dates, addresses,… [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The initial order should only be an interim one. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The article notes, ”H. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
That is unusual: most states have just one intermediate appellate court. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Unbeknownst to many Kentucky attorneys, United States District Court Judge John G. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Unbeknownst to many Kentucky attorneys, United States District Court Judge John G. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on April 17, 1889. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
Read part One here and Two here.] [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
As we said, the object of granting the concessional rate of duty was to protect the smaller units in the industry from the competition by the larger ones and that object would have been frustrated, if, by adopting the device of fragmentation, the larger units could become the ultimate beneficiaries of the bounty. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
I have posted the article to my email lists, one for attorneys and law philosophers (fewer than 100), and one for people seeking legal remedy or more data on popular law topics (nearly 1500). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
This link provides ample evidence about this from various news articles. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:13 pm
But as the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
Below, is an example of an article of manufacture claim for a software invention: One or more processor readable storage devices having processor readable code embodied on said processor readable storage devices, said processor readable code for programming one or more processors to perform a method for determining a speed of a bat during a swing, the method comprising the steps of: accessing radar data based on a set of one or… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
Quon, the United States Supreme Court decided that the City of Ontario, California could review the non-work-related text messages to and from a City police officer on a City-issued electronic pager. [read post]
