Search for: "United States v. Ortiz"
Results 121 - 140
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-7394; Ortiz-Zape v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Plaintiffs' argument that their due process rights under the United States and New York State Constitutions as their property interests in promotion were adversely affected as the result of the establishment of the two titles by the Department of Civil Service at DOCCS' request, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Andriola v Ortiz, 82 NY2d 320, explained "a person successfully passing a competitive [c]ivil [s]ervice… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Addressing Plaintiffs' argument that their due process rights under the United States and New York State Constitutions as their property interests in promotion were adversely affected as the result of the establishment of the two titles by the Department of Civil Service at DOCCS' request, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Andriola v Ortiz, 82 NY2d 320, explained "a person successfully passing a competitive [c]ivil [s]ervice… [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
Audio recordings of oral arguments in each of the following cases are now available (click on the case name to link to the audio recording): United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
D & P Holding S.A.. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
United States, and Ortiz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:10 pm
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
United States, 512 F. 2d 1176 (9 th Cir. 1975). [read post]
Eleventh Circuit Notes Split Re Standard of Review for a District Court's Denial of a Franks Hearing
17 Jun 2009, 3:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:03 pm
Plaintiff Rogasciano Santiago allegedly entered the United States illegally in 1993, coming to Chicago. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:11 am
United States HUD, No. 15-5008, 2016 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the search of three residences in a Kansas City methamphetamine case in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:11 pm
The court also agreed that Wellbutrin correctly distinguished the opinions of the Supreme Court in Ortiz v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
Feb. 8, 2012) United Sur. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
§ 1595a(c)(1)(A), which says, "Merchandise which is introduced or attempted to be introduced into the United States contrary to law shall be ... seized and forfeited if it is stolen, smuggled, or clandestinely imported or introduced." [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:26 pm
Conrad v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
United States, Black v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 am
Ct. 2669; see also United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:12 am
United States, 458 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir.2006); Clark Equip. [read post]
12 May 2015, 6:15 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
