Search for: "United States v. Pedro" Results 121 - 136 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
REALTY real estate 1 Roman T Brzozowski TVCityUSA.com advertising 2 Roman T Brzozowski TvCityUSA Adv. 2 Tom Ripellino Metropolis Real Estate Broker/Owner 3 Charles Brown Chatre Appraisals Inc Real Estate Appraiser 1 Petar VIDEV A&I Broadway Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 3 Vlad Porter VB Porter & Company Real Estate Broker/Consultant 3 Kelvin Chan N/A Homebuyer 2 Enny Donaldson Fortune Property Foreclosure Specialist … [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:37 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court's Reliance on Record, Including Presentence Report, Was Adequate Basis for Imposed Sentence United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:44 am
 In its order, the court commented: “The Supreme Court of the United States has not yet indicated that, in cases in this posture, all executions by lethal injection should be stayed. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:42 pm
The petitioners' summarize their petition: "The impetus for this action is the Supreme Court of the United State's grant of certiorari in Baze v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Both of those cases followed botched electric chair executions (Jesse Tafero and Pedro Medina). [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:23 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticePrior Shoplifting Offenses Not ‘Similar' to Passing Bad Check; No Error in Criminal History Computation United States, appellee v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeSentence Correctly Calculated, Motion Not Brought In District of Confinement; Clarification Denied United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Seized Account Funds Must Be Returned; Lis Pendens Against 'Substitute' Forfeitable Properties Vacated United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2004, 6:01 am
As noted by Professor Douglas Berman at Sentencing Law & Policy here, with the opinion in United States v. [read post]