Search for: "United States v. Pete"
Results 121 - 140
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
It was only the Iowa court below, along with 12 other state courts, that had reached a contrary conclusion.The franchisor further argued that continued state court repudiation of the physical presence requirement adversely affected the entire United States economy and had international implications. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
United States was hazy. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 8:23 pm
In addition, the United States' amicus brief also represents HUD's interpretation of the ILSA warranting Skidmore deference. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:38 am
The rationale for extending the statute to situations such as this was to protect and enhance the commercial reputation of New York by regulating not only franchise offers directed at New York from other states, but also those originating in New York, from New York-based franchisors, in the court’s view.The July 7 opinion in A Love of Food I, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:52 am
Dettelbach, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:52 am
Dettelbach, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
" On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:45 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
Im Pete Padilla from Kent City, Kent. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm
Pete, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
Policy in MIGHT V. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Miller, editor ; with Louis Aucoin.Washington, DC : United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010.Constitutional LawKF4930 .O75 2010The origins of the necessary and proper clause / Gary Lawson ... [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
The United States Supreme Court had an opportunity in Bilski v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:13 am
Ind.1991); Pete Rinaldi’s Fast Foods v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(1709 Blog) Rightslink gets an upgrade (1709 Blog) Australia Fitzroy Football Club v Brisbane Lions –logo dispute settles (IP Whiteboard) FCA: Entitlement to a design: Courier Pete Pty Ltd v Metroll Queensland Pty Ltd (ipwars.com) (Class 99) (Patentology) Brazil The Brazilian Council of Cultural Entities gives its opinion – copyright reform (IP tango) Good news from Brazil – new online tools for tracking INPI processes; GIs (IP tango) Canada Plaintiff… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:51 pm
There was insufficient evidence that former Senator Pete V. [read post]
