Search for: "United States v. Porter" Results 121 - 140 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (1950)1 Porter v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
But while Alito remained in government, Garland’s career also included several years in private practice at Arnold & Porter, where he was named a partner in 1985. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:08 pm
" The government repeatedly cites United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:58 am by Guest Blogger
 Rob Weiner, formerly Associate Deputy Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice, is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP. [read post]
As one of many examples, after the Titanic sank, the United States enacted a law that required any American ship carrying over 100 tons of weight to have enough lifeboats for every passenger. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:32 am by Erin Miller
As a guest on the Peter Jennings Blog, Lyle Denniston, the reporter for this blog, commented on the recent per curiam opinion in Porter v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Section 3 states that "No person" can hold any state or federal office if they had previously been "a member of Congress, or… an officer of the United States" or a state official, and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials. [read post]