Search for: "United States v. Reid"
Results 121 - 140
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 11:20 am
Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader, stated on the Senate floor: “The Redskins no longer have trademarks. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:33 am
(CCNV v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
People v Reid, 19 N.Y.3d 382, 387-388 (N.Y. 2012). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:51 pm
In Michaels v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
The Nevada Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the case, which will be argued on Wednesday, “could go a long way toward reversing abortion rights in the United States[:] Whether they ultimately revert by four years or 47 remains to be seen. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
In R. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 [1923]), held that Ofshe's theories have not gained "general acceptance in the scientific community," and refused to allow him to testify for the defense. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Polonetsky v Better Homes Depot, 97 NY2d 46, 54; Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201; Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1180-1181; Reid v Gateway Sherman, Inc., 60 AD3d 836, 837; Roth v Goldman, 254 AD2d 405, 406), the complaint adequately stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice by alleging that during its… [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
This case will be settled by the United States Supreme Court! [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:34 am
United States 24-571Issues: (1) Whether, under Honeycutt v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 3:00 am
The Fourteenth Amendment starts and ends as a model of clarity, stating that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States” are “citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
United States, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).To which I can only respond, “huh”? [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:45 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201). [read post]
