Search for: "United States v. Rivers"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
In South Yuba River Citizens League v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
The Supreme Court flatly rejected this analysis, and found that the United States does not own the Nation River. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:07 pm
Settoon is owned and operated by Settoon Towing, a Jones Act employer providing marine transportation throughout the inland waterways of the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Wetlands separated from other waters of the United States by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes and the like are “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 2:40 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
Maritime Laws and Regulations: Lakes and Rivers In Kaiser Aetna v. the United States, the Supreme Court determined that a waterway is navigable if it is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, has navigable capacity, and connects to continuous interstate and/or international waterways. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:02 pm
Lewis, the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:46 pm
New Amicus briefs were filed in support of the Tribe in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:41 pm
United States (unjust taking of land)Luckerman v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 6:57 pm
Whiting Paper Co., No. 13-2447, and United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:21 pm
On February 2, 2023, the California Court of Appeal issued an important follow-up decision to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
On July 17, 2023, the California Supreme Court decided an important state law issue raised by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:33 pm
United States, 75 Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
In June, the Supreme Court agreed to review this question: Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:39 am
United States (D. [read post]
