Search for: "United States v. Rivers" Results 121 - 140 of 1,920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am by Amy Howe
” The CWA defines navigable waters as “waters of the United States. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am by Evan George
In fact, plaintiffs allege that Montana has warmed more than most of the contiguous United States because northern latitudes heat more quickly. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am by Scott Bomboy
It involves the scope of the Supreme Court’s exclusive jurisdiction over the river’s waters.Biden v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
State of Alaska, Dept. of Health & Social Serivces, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:21 pm by Gordon Firemark
But Price continued his suit for declaratory and injunctive relief, arguing that the permit-and-fee requirements were “facially unconstitutional” under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
According to a recently published study by Charles River Associates (CRA), prepared for the Fair Standards Alliance, “smartphone-related upstream R&D spend of SEP holders in 2020 amounted, roughly, to only $2 billion. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court vacated the affirmance in June 2022, when it granted Uber’s petition for writ of certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:00 am by Will Korn
Rosenthal, United States District Court judge for the Southern District of Texas, and Reagan W. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 3:32 am by jonathanturley
Notably, the Court did not uphold the compromise struck by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in enjoining some recent changes while continuing to allow the drug to be distributed nationally. [read post]