Search for: "United States v. Rudi" Results 121 - 140 of 167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
 Giuliani and his fellow enabler Chris Christie have pointed out, probably correctly, that the sociopath broke no laws in zeroing out his participation in helping to finance what the United States does. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Our second largest state seceded from Mexico (and then, of course, with ten other states, attempted to secede from the United States in a struggle that ultimately cost 750,000 lives (for starters). [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:47 am by Gene Quinn
The case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court on the issue of attorneys’ fees. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:06 pm by Mark Dighton
On the Record with Rudy Telscher Rudy Telscher, a partner with Harness Dickey, represented Octane Fitness in one of the most important patent cases decided by the United States Supreme Court over the last decade. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
Ressam plotted a terrorist attack against the United States with the potential to kill and injure a large number of people. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
In yesterday's post on Google's opening brief in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:14 am by admin
See Roberts v. the People of the United States National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Gmlevine
Isaac Goldstein, D2010-0279 (WIPO May 7, 2010) (Parties in the United States and Hong Kong). [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm by axd10
Internationalism and Where United States Courts Should Find International Law. 24 Penn St. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:31 am by gmlevine
It is the registered proprietor of many trademarks for LA QUINTA and variants of that trademark both within the United States and internationally, including in Italy where the Respondent is domiciled. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by PaulKostro
The United States Supreme Court held that, consistent with the First Amendment, a state could not “punish the truthful publication of an alleged juvenile delinquent’s name lawfully obtained by a newspaper. [read post]