Search for: "United States v. Sealed Defendant One"
Results 121 - 140
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
The court noted that '(a)lthough minor, (spitting) is an application of force to the body of the victim, a bodily contact highly offensive...' 183 Misc2d at 834, citing United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 573, 585-86 (1980). [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 573, 585-86 (1980). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:13 pm
The relator files its complaint under seal with the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has consistently held that states may not punish the publication of truthful matters by the media. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:31 am
It asserts state tort claims against all the individual defendants, rather than against the United States, as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Is the government the plaintiff, the defendant, or merely a non-litigant in possession of potentially relevant evidence? [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
We have also used such conductors or burners of various shapes, such as pieces with their lower ends secured to their respective supports, and having their upper ends united so as to form an inverted V-shaped burner. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
One of his legal advisors put it bluntly: “We’re waiting for the United States Supreme Court—of which the President has nominated three justices—to step in and do something. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
[The] State of Minnesota charged Ziegler with three counts of criminal vehicular operation and one count of reckless driving.State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:39 am
CanadaCharter of Rights and Freedoms: Andrew Wakeling is wanted in the United States for drug charges. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:42 am
In the United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
United States, in which the Court – again divided six to three – held that a criminal defendant whose assets have been frozen before his trial does not have a right to a hearing to challenge the probable cause for his indictment, even if he needs the money to hire a lawyer to defend him against the charges. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
Capital One the Court issued a summary denial of the defendant's petition for review, letting stand the judgment and opinion of the intermediate court of appeals in El Paso. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
I know of only one appellate case that authorized a similar order, People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm
And, defendants have a right to confront their accusers. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
United States (5th Cir. 2013)). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
The District Court Judge then pointed out that the Government complied with the Court's order by providing a declaration from Robert Patterson, an Assistant Special Agent in Charge at the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (`DEA’), which the Government initially filed ex parte and under seal and later filed publicly in redacted form. [read post]
