Search for: "United States v. Sotomayor"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm
He doesn’t inspire trust or confidence in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
“Maybe put most boldly, I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
The first installment focused on Justice Gorsuch's colloquies about Officers of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am
UBS Securities LLC et al., case number 22-660, before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Kirtz, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor goes on a little longer on Murray v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
“It’s by the chief justice of the United States a year after the 14th Amendment,” Kavanaugh said in a reference to Chase. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Justice Gorsuch was the most interested questioner on whether the President was an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
So one might think, but in the 2015 case of Glossip v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
Code Section 1441, which allows defendants to remove to federal court "any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
See, Taylor 495 U.S. at 600; United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In Alabama v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
It was a huge setback for efforts to dismantle the ongoing privilege of whiteness in the United States and is symptomatic of resistance among movement conservatives on and off the Court to efforts to build a more inclusive society.In both respects, Students for Fair Admissions is a deeply undemocratic decision. [read post]
