Search for: "United States v. Stage Co." Results 121 - 140 of 1,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The development of the birth control pill, which was first available in the United States in 1960, meant that women could engage in sexual activity with at least some protection against unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Ericsson mmWave trial: Apple dropped one of its three patents-in-suit right before trialFor the same day--yesterday--the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) had scheduled the trial of Apple's countersuit against Ericsson. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
Frank, in connection with a contract for the design, decoration, and staging for sale of the defendants’ residence at 3 Cooper Lane in Westport. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:17 pm by Florian Mueller
-based antitrust lawyers just appeared (electronically) before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California as counsel for Apple:Daniel G. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:37 am by John Elwood
United States, and remanded for a determination whether the error was harmless. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:46 am by Norman L. Eisen
United States — and when and how to apply the tests the Supreme Court ordered her to administer. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
(Disclosure: Akin Gump is co-counsel for the petitioner.) [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 1:44 pm by Caroline Gentry
Applying the United States Supreme Court’s recent class action decisions in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Title VII was already on the books, but, when first asked in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm by Jonathan Moss
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]