Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2011, 6:56 pm
See Shelly v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:42 am
Buie, No. 278732, holding, in a case of first impression for Michigan, that the United States Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause analysis in Maryland v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:59 pm
The case of Fender v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 6:41 am
United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
This case, originally filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on claims of patent infringement, was brought on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:00 am
Here is the order in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:19 am
In Michigan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 6:46 am
Under the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the United States Constitution are incorporated, and apply to state governments. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 7:09 am
This candidate believes the Indian Child Welfare Act is unconstitutional because two members of the United States Supreme Court dissented in Haaland v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:39 pm
National Pride at Work v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Enbridge has countered Michigan’s demand with an action for declaratory and injunctive relief before the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan Southern Division (Federal Court), arguing that the state lacks the authority to terminate the Line 5 easement as the matter falls under federal jurisdiction under the Pipeline Safety Act. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:24 pm
., United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
