Search for: "United States v. Sweet" Results 121 - 140 of 418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida indicted Rutgerson with one count of:`using any facility and means of interstate commerce, [to] knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce an individual who had not attained the age of eighteen years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:02 am by SHG
It’s remarkably sweet, and yet not sweet enough. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Rick St. Hilaire
“The Guild’s arguments ... are the same as those this Court has rejected time and again,” wrote Assistant United States Attorney. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
Moreover, the proclamation’s applicability only to non-visa-holders outside the United States puts it in the sweet spot of judicial deference to the political branches, as the Supreme Court showed in the travel ban case. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am by New Books Script
Toronto, Ont. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 1:18 pm
Para finalizar, y entre otros comentarios, se destaca la anotación de la sentencia Af-Cap Inc v Chevron Overseas (Congo) Ltd 475 F.3d 1080 (2007) (9th Cir (US) titulada United States: execution of a judgment against the property of a foreign sovereign under the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:07 pm by Maritime Blogger
Settoon is owned and operated by Settoon Towing, a Jones Act employer providing marine transportation throughout the inland waterways of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:18 am by Jennifer Lynch
We filed an amicus brief in a federal appellate case called United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am by SHG
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:15 am
UNITED STATES - ScaliaNot much to go on, I know. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]