Search for: "United States v. Under Seal"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 9:34 pm
” Gannett Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:42 pm
United States ex. rel. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:17 am
In 1982, in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:10 pm
Beginning in 2001 (and ending around 2003), however, Jose Cuervo began selling the tequila in the United States with a red dripping wax seal reminiscent of the Maker’s Mark bottle. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am
But the Court noted that states may still holds power over them under Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
The United States filed its opposition on June 5, 2015. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
United States, 703 F.2d 74, 75 (4th Cir.1983). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 am
The whistleblower argued that he had disclosed the underlying facts in the original complaint, filed under seal, and that the United States had investigated those facts over a lengthy period of time before declining to intervene. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:47 am
Brooks Company v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
Here is the opinion: Two Shields Opinion An excerpt: Appellants Ramona Two Shields and Mary Louise Defender Wilson are Indians with interests in land allotted to them by the United States under the Dawes Act of 1887. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:53 am
In a recent prebid protest presented by our firm, Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan, the United States Court of Federal Claims considered the protest of Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:37 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:48 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:25 am
The materials at issue, however, will remain under seal for 14 days from entry of this order to allow either party to seek review of this order by a United States District Judge. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
Given that Congress created the FCA’s qui tam right to bring suit in the name of the United States, Congress certainly could add conditions to safeguard the interests of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
One might justify what the Court did in Marschalk as stemming from the same pressures that led to the quick and decisive resolution of the Iranian claims isssue that prompted Dames & Moore itself, but in the typical case, a "GVR" in light of the new decision seems right on.Same, too, with the most recent well-known effort by a court of appeals to have the Supreme Court answer a certified question -- the en banc Second Circuit's 2005 certificate in… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
Pierce United States District Court for C.D. [read post]
