Search for: "United States v. United States Currency"
Results 121 - 140
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:21 am
., the plaintiffs argued that, from 2001 to 2003, the currency exchange rate differential between the strong U.S. dollar and the weaker Canadian dollar created arbitrage opportunities in the gray market to sell lower-priced Canadian cars in the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:33 pm
Judiciary Law § 27 ... states: ["]In any case in which the cause of action is based upon an obligation denominated in a currency other than currency of the United States, a court shall render or enter a judgment or decree in the foreign currency of the underlying obligation. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:58 am
In the case, Skatteverket (Swedish Tax Agency) v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
United States v. $291,828.00 in United States Currency, 2008 U.S. [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:25 pm
That being said, it’s also required me to read A LOT about the history of money and its regulation in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:20 pm
Some limitations on the expansion of federal preemption, based on a distinction between visitorial powers and enforcement powers, were introduced in the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Cuomo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:50 am
Just three days ago, I noted United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
In its ruling in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:02 pm
United States v. $487,825.00 in United States Currency, No. 06-3138 (3d Cir. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Read more: The ECtHR judgment Our case summary of Carson; Reynolds v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (May 2005 – House of Lords, 2003 – Court of Appeal) Media coverage in The Guardian and on the BBC website [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:31 am
The case is called United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am
The country enacted laws and issued decrees that broke the prior links to the currency and indices of the United States and set up a contract-renegotiation process, excluding from that process licensees that sought relief through courts or arbitration. [read post]
