Search for: "United Van Lines, Inc. v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
This is a truly mobile system, it will sit in a patrol car or police van and provide you with the same quality of results as Lion’s stationary evidential units. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, July 2, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle,Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:25 am
Sherwood Van Lines, Inc., 50 F.3d 1014, 1017 (Fed. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
There nonetheless are a couple of issues on which the Court’s majority followed that just-cited line-up – the left plus Justice Kennedy – but for which a new appointment could realistically change the result because the issues do not necessarily track the traditional liberal-versus- conservative breakdown: executive power and preemption. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:05 am
Patrick’s Day Parade and the United States Supreme Court, Gretchen Van Ness, 30 New Eng.L.Rev. 625 (1996). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., Defendant.No. 07-CV-95-LRR.Feb. 9, 2010.ORDERLINDA R. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Recently, French courts recognised a Belgian award which had been annulled in Brussels because it was not in line with mandatory EU law.19 The French courts had only verified that the award did not violate EU law in a flagrant way and, consequently, had permitted its recognition.20 As a result, diverging judicial decisions on the application of mandatory European law occurred in the Internal Market.21 With regard to judgments, European procedural law clearly precludes such constellation: A… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
See also North American Van Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Yet the Court concludes the trial court abused its discretion in not stating a more specific reason for its ruling, creating new law on mandamus and overturning a long line of precedent in the process.The Court points to a number of jurisdictions that require a trial court to articul [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
" See also Van Valkenburgh v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 792 F. 2d 210, 218, n.4 (D.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
TITLE International governance and law : state regulation and non-state law / edited by Hanneke van Schooten and Johathan Verschuuren. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
