Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 1" Results 121 - 140 of 2,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2016, 12:47 pm
Patent and Trademark Office: ELANCO, registration number 710,473COMFORTIS, registration number 3,370,168INTERCEPTOR, registration number 2,015,850CAPSTAR, registration number 2,510,863 TRIFEXIS, registration number 3,944,743 Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Scott Martin d/b/a Best Value Pet Supplies of Queensland, Australia and various unknown "Doe" Defendants infringed the trademarks at issue by selling in the U.S. trademarked products that were intended for… [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 12:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the instant case, there are a number of factual issues for a jury to decide that are relevant to the determination as to whether the defendant's acts constituted a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death, namely: (1) Was the injection intravenous or subcutaneous? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:33 pm by Xandra Kramer
Several issues are highlighted: first, the existence of an international element in the case of a defendant with unknown domicile whose nationality differs from the state of the court seized; secondly, the application of Article 4(1) Brussels I Regulation if the domicile of the defendant is unknown and (since the ECJ does not apply Article 4(1) in this regard) the interpretation of Article 16(2) Brussels I Regulation; thirdly, the requirement… [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:11 pm
What remains unknown and without evidentiary support, however, is how Defendant Hanner came to be in possession of Cricket cellular telephone 412-628-5290 and/or whether Defendant Hanner was an authorized user of the phone. . . . [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 2:48 am by Stefano Dominelli
The case In a recent decision published October 30th, 2020 (ordinanza 24110/2020) the Italian Supreme Court has applied two provisions of the Brussels Ia Regulation, namely art. 8 n. 1, and art. 7 n. 2, in a context of multiple actions for fraud started by the Italian investors against a number of defendants. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Does: In this action against unnamed and unknown defendants, John Does 1–11 …, Richard Roe … moves to proceed under a pseudonym or, in the alternative, to seal the case. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
When the identities of defendants are not known before a complaint is filed, a plaintiff `should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the unknown defendants, unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities, or that the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds.' Gillespie v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:14 am
Sounds right to me, if the defendant’s address is unknown, and if there is evidence that the defendant is indeed regularly checking his Facebook account. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Section 13(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 allows a Court to order that a non-party to cease communicating a defendant’s defamatory statement. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
’ Upon receiving the report of `unknown’ compliance status, Officer Rempe activated his emergency lights and pulled over Defendant's vehicle to investigate further. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:00 am
However, considering the officers' conduct, and the many unknown facts surrounding this incident, we must conclude that the State failed to meet its burden to prove not only that Defendant gave his consent, but also that the consent was free and voluntary. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:09 am
But $1 million for defense lawyers BEFORE THE TRIAL HAS EVEN STARTED is clearly ridiculous and an insult to Georgia taxpayers. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:35 am by Michael DelSignore
The officer then entered the defendant's vehicle to lock he vehicle and remove the keys at the defendant's request, and while doing so found another prescription pill container, unlabeled, on the front passenger seat, with pills identical to the unknown pills discovered in the defendant's pocket. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Naturally, defendant lawyers began deploying stock responses that statements did not meet the ‘Section 1 threshold’. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:24 am
Cantor’s whereabouts were perpetually unknown to defendant even in the deposition of Diana Topp, she testified she had no idea of the whereabouts of Ms. [read post]