Search for: "Unknown Owners or Claimants" Results 121 - 140 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
If “yes”, the second question arises: in all the circumstances, must the interest of the owner of the private information yield to the right of freedom of expression conferred on the publisher by article 10? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
If “yes”, the second question arises: in all the circumstances, must the interest of the owner of the private information yield to the right of freedom of expression conferred on the publisher by article 10? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:57 am by J
The claimants were the current owners, having purchased in 2007. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:57 am by J
The claimants were the current owners, having purchased in 2007. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:22 am by Chip Merlin
The Bill is bad for homeowners, condominium owners, business policyholders and condominium associations. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:19 am
Motor Vehicle Acc Indemnification Corp., 83 AD2d 803 (1st Dept. 1981) found:The record before this Court demonstrates that claimant is not a qualified person. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:14 pm by emagraken
Those are the paragraphs in which it is alleged that the identity of the driver/owner was ascertainable and that the claimant has not complied with the Act in failing to make all reasonable efforts to ascertain the identity of the unknown driver. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:56 am by emagraken
 231, the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (“ICBC”) may be the nominal defendant and liable for damages to the plaintiff for damages from a motor vehicle accident where the identities of the owner and driver of the other vehicle involved are not ascertained. [5]             ICBC will only be liable as nominal defendant if the plaintiff has made “all reasonable efforts to ascertain the identity… [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:23 am
Defendants John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company who are sued herein under fictitious names because their true names and capacities are unknown at this time. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
"22 The Act was not intended to apply to errors and omissions coverage written on a "claims made" basis for persons such as design professionals.The first part also addresses an insurer’s duty to defend a construction professional against a property owner’s notice of claim served under CDARA. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am by Veronika Gaertner
Title reserveration clauses, however, must be carefully dinstinguished from situations where the claimant is the owner of the asset in question by virtue of a fiduciary transfer of ownership for security purposes. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:28 pm
It is unknown what occurred to the car, whether the defendants used it for personal purposes or profit. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  In that case, the claimant’s private travel journals had been disclosed by one of his former employees. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:31 pm by MacIsaac
The assailants remained unknown and the Plaintiff sued ICBC directly for her injuries under section 24. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:20 pm by MacIsaac
 The collision was a hit and run and the identity of the driver/owner of the vehicle remained unknown at the time of trial. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:13 am by Alan Ackerman
  Many states have a process whereby an inactive account escheats to the state after it is not requested by its rightful owner. [read post]