Search for: "V " Results 121 - 140 of 492,296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Miranda Rights in Alabama: What Birmingham Defendants Need to Know
17 Jun 2024, 11:20 am by Richard Perry
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
Birmingham Criminal Defense Blog - http://www.criminal-defense-attorney.info/
A Look at Key USPTO Director Review Decisions and their Significance
17 Jun 2024, 11:15 am by Alexander Stein
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in United States v. [read post]
IPWatchdog.com | Patent Copyright Trademark - http://www.ipwatchdog.com
A Look at Key USPTO Director Review Decisions and their Significance
17 Jun 2024, 11:15 am by Alexander Stein
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in United States v. [read post]
IPWatchdog - http://www.ipwatchdog.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "What Happens … When Two School Employees Suspect That Their Colleague is Under the Influence
17 Jun 2024, 11:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Ky.) in Lawson v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court Accepts Mail/Wire Fraud Case that Explores "Property"
17 Jun 2024, 11:11 am by Ellen Podgor
The Supreme Court accepted the following case today: 23-909 KOUSISIS V. [read post]
White Collar Crime Prof Blog - https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/
[Eugene Volokh] $47K Sanctions for "Filing … Election Challenge Without Substantial Justification" in Arizona
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Acosta v Yonkers Pub. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Acosta v Yonkers Pub. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Is Promotion of Free Services "Commercial Speech" for First Amendment Purposes?
17 Jun 2024, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Judge Roy Altman leads by example (with unrelated updated)
17 Jun 2024, 10:03 am by David Oscar Markus
Story on @nbc6 starting at noon. pic.twitter.com/ybgWz1tGJb— Ari Odzer (@ariodzernbc6) June 17, 2024In an unrelated update, the Supreme Court granted cert today in another fraud case, Kousisis v. [read post]
Southern District of Florida Blog - http://sdfla.blogspot.com/
Trade Secret Misappropriation Preliminary Injunction Reversed
17 Jun 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Insulet Corp. v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Initial thoughts on Elster
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Blog Post: CA4 on Credibility, Evidence: Garcia Cortes v. Garland
17 Jun 2024, 9:46 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Garcia Cortes v. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
City of Aspen v. Burlingame Ranch II Condominium Owners Association: Clarifying the Application of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act
17 Jun 2024, 9:20 am by David McLain
The post City of Aspen v. [read post]
Colorado Construction Litigation Blog - https://www.hhmrlaw.com/blog.html
CFPB issues proposal to prohibit use of medical debt information in credit decisions
17 Jun 2024, 8:57 am by John L. Culhane, Jr. and Joseph J. Schuster
The steady drumbeat of steps during Rohit Chopra’s tenure as CFPB Director to call into question the reliability and predictability of medical debt information in credit underwriting reached a crescendo last week with the CFPB’s issuance of a proposed rule to eliminate the exception in Regulation V (which implements the Fair Credit Reporting Act) that currently allows creditors to obtain and use medical debt information in connection with credit eligibility determinations. [read post]
CFPB Monitor - http://www.cfpbmonitor.com
Driver on SFFA v. Harvard
17 Jun 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
(SFFA) v. [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
Democracy on Trial: Chestek and the Future of USPTO Accountability
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Ass’n v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Will Biometric Privacy Laws Undermine the Fight Against CSAM?–Martell v. X
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am by Eric Goldman
–Martell v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Todd: While Tax World Waits For Moore, Supreme Court Decides Important Connelly Estate Tax Case
17 Jun 2024, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Todd (Interim Dean, Liberty; Google Scholar): Although the eyes of the tax world have been focused on the pending decision in Moore v. [read post]
TaxProf Blog - https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/
WAS PEPSICO BLIND TO THE LAW?
17 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
”After it placed the employee on unpaid leave, the company claimed it had no other positions that were suitable for the individual and eventually fired him.Believing that such conduct violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
Real Estate Law Blog - http://www.nyrealestatelawblog.com/