Search for: "Valle v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2014, 6:26 am
By Paul Hellyer Fair Use Guidelines After the Georgia State Case In this last installment of VALL’s Copyright Column, we’ll take a look at the recent ruling from the 11th Circuit in the Georgia State University copyright infringement case.[1]As other commentators have already pointed out, this ruling is mostly favorable to users and libraries. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Valles, 62 NY2d 36, People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:02 am
United States,[1]which the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:26 pm
G & G states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm
Aguirre, Beatriz Zarate, Graciela Valles and Taqueria Los Gallos, Inc. of Logansport, Indiana illegally intercepted satellite signals and broadcast the "Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:43 am
Clerk, next case.CLERK: State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
Valle del Sol, Inc. 13-806Issue: (1) Whether respondents have Article III standing and have established the requisite imminent risk of irreparable harm to obtain an injunction of Ariz. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:21 pm
The petition of the day is: Arizona v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:38 pm
Vallés) ECJ Rules on Jurisdiction for Copyright Infringement [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:00 am
Bridgeman, associate general counsel, Freddie MacDeborah V. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
Vallée, 2006 QCCS 3363; Gillet c. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:40 am
United States (D. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
By Matthew Hinks State density bonus law -- one of many California statutes enacted to implement the state's policy of promoting the construction of affordable housing -- has withstood a significant challenge posed by the County of Napa (the "County") in a new California Court of Appeal opinion, Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 2:45 pm
Arizona, however, has failed to justify a need to serve that interest through targeting and penalizing day labor solicitation that blocks traffic, rather than directly targeting those who create traffic hazards without reference to their speech, as currently proscribed under the State’s preexisting traffic laws. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:41 am
’ The subject matter at issue is likely to be entirely foreign to the jury, and Dietz's testimony is likely to be helpful to the jury in assessing Valle's state of mind.U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:15 am
One outside expert, Joseph V. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
Maxzone (Cartel Sentencing) In an important Federal Court decision issued in September, 2012 in the ongoing global auto parts price-fixing investigation (R. v. [read post]
