Search for: "Vaughn v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2011, 10:15 pm
United States District Court Judge Lee Rosenthal focused her remarks on what jurisdictions with developing complex litigation procedures can learn from the experience of the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
In the March 20, 2013 opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
District Court Judge Vaughn Walker of the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm
District Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:06 am
Of course many media outlets are picking up on United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
Like all federal cases, Perry started in a District Court, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
The defense made several additional arguments for the abatement, relying upon the factors in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:45 pm
District Judge Vaughn Walker of San Francisco allowed the Hepting lawsuit to go forward despite the state secrets claim. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Nov. 24, 2008)(Unpub)Rejecting employee's "pointillist painting" theory, affirms dismissal of fem's gender/HWE/retal claims [related to Vaughn decision, next] Vaughn v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Vaughn; Close-It Enterprises v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
