Search for: "Vest v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2017, 5:42 pm
Attard v Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, 2017 WL 3711765 (CA App. 8/29/2017)Filed under: Equitable Estoppel, Vested Rights [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:45 pm
May (The Free State Foundation) & Andrew Magloughlin (The Free State Foundation) have posted NFIB V. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
United States</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:22 pm
Irving Trust Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:22 pm
The Court acknowledged that the language in the letter to stockholders that accompanied the proxy statement did urge approval of the Plan and stated that the Original Awards would vest "only ifperformance conditions are achieved. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 1:31 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 24, 2018, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:00 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 24, 2018, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
But it also states that when the action was raised, £8,000 of fees from one invoice were outstanding from one partner’s accounts. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:08 pm
In ZNK Investments CC v Luckytso Transport and Construction CC, a sale in execution of a deregistered close corporation had taken place whilst it was deregistered. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:42 pm
Adkins.Holding: The expenditure of over a million dollars to purchase property and obtain state permits does not, by itself, grant a vested right to a landowner or permit a landowner to succeed in an equitable estoppel claim against a government which has revised its zoning code in a manner that precludes a landowner's intended use of the property.Facts: Landowner sought to construct a landfill in Harford County. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:33 pm
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Sarah Burke In Cecchini v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 5:00 pm
In this case, he argued that the poll tax was rational because Virginia was seeking to collect revenue and believed that citizens who paid to vote would have a more vested interest in influencing the state’s policies. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:32 pm
In this context, CAAF’s 3-2 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
In Louisiana Department of Justice v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 11:20 am
" However, opined the court, "In New York ... the Legislature—not the Governor—may ordinarily define the terms on which non-constitutional state officers may be appointed and removed.Considering the Plaintiff's secondary arguments, the court decided "the Commission's placement within the Department of State does not violate Article V of the State Constitution. [read post]
