Search for: "W. Blackstone ("
Results 121 - 132
of 132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2009, 9:01 am
He was then elected Solicitor of the Board of City Trusts and appointed Attorney-General of the Commonwealth by Governor John W. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
AUTHOR Calomiris, Charles W. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:55 pm
See William Blackstone, 4 Commentaries *292. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:01 am
As this W$J article from yesterday notes, the deal ended being structured with "only" $20 billion in bank debt rather than $25 billion (with Blackstone pitching in $6 million in equity), but that really didn't change the fundamental of the deal much. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 11:58 am
Blackstone, Fresno, CA 93650 * 4304 W. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:07 pm
Rev. 785, 803 (1988) (citing piracy as the "archetypal universal crime"), and federal courts have historically accepted the notion that a pirate may be tried by any state, see Smith, 18 U.S. at 176 ("piracy . . . is an offense against the universal law of society, a pirate being, according to Sir Edward Coke, hostis humani generis [an enemy of the human race]") (quoting 4 Blackstone's Commentaries *71, 73). [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Wade, 82 Yale L.J. 920 (1973). 17 436 William W. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 3:15 am
[W]e shouldn't be surprised [by the Blackstone IPO]. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:03 pm
From Albert W. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:01 pm
Nonetheless, the use of acquitted conduct in sentencing is sufficiently counterintutive -- at least to Judge Fletcher -- to compel a dissent.Judge Fletcher's dissent has some pretty good lines, and uses Blackstone and others to highlight the significance of a jury's verdict and the dangers that arise from the rejection of that verdict in sentencing. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 343 (1769), and that "an accusation which lacks any particular fact which the law makes essential to the punishment is ... no accusation within the requirements of the common law, and it is no accusation in reason," 1 J. [read post]
