Search for: "WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS"
Results 121 - 135
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
Granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Hawaii v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
That view is not and cannot be correct. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Please send any corrections, comments, and suggestions to NDAAbook.lawfare@gmail.com. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
As noted by Braiden and Brockman, whether or not the Department of Justice officials are partial or impartial in their decisions, it is imperative that justice appears to have been achieved. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
Alterman, Sue Mi Terry, William Alan Reinsch and Louis Lauter will be present. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
(We do not opine whether the House was correct in alleging that Blount violated any actual laws of the United States.) [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
E-mail: yvonne@tdoa.state.tx.us Texas Department on Aging 4900 North Lamar, 4th Floor Austin, TX 78751-2316 Phone: (512)424-6840; (800) 252-9240 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.tdoa.state.tx.us/index.htm AARP Texas 98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 750 Austin, TX 78701 Phone: (512) 480-9797 Fax: (512) 480-9799 Web: http://www.aarp.org/states/tx ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Disability Law Resource Project 2323 South Shepard Boulevard, Suite 1000 Houston, TX… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
FSIS has yet to learn this valuable lesson.The July 10, 2000 edition of Food Chemical News, discussing the SB litigation, stated that: "In a landmark court ruling in May, the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas prohibited USDA from concluding that grinding plants are insanitary or that their products are adulterated based on Salmonella test results (Supreme Beef Processors Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
