Search for: "Wakefield v. Wakefield"
Results 121 - 140
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2009, 11:16 am
See, e.g., Wakefield v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
The magistrate's conclusion was based on plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in complaining that he was assigned to a Sunday morning work detail that interfered with Protestant services.In Wakefield v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 5:33 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:53 am
Recently in the Bronx Times, the Wakefield Taxpayers and Civic League (for more about who they are, look here) mentioned Bronx Community Solutions in their weekly column on community conditions, complied by Mary V. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 11:26 pm
See Bowyer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
The court said plaintiff had not demonstrated any substantial burden on his religious practice.In Wakefield v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
I was 20 and looked 14 with a mental age about the same, in a man's world, "Monster Mansion", HMP Wakefield. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:51 am
Derus Wakefield I, LLC (Div. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:00 pm
The holding is in conflict with Wakefield v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T Court of Appeal “A child supervision order had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 10:46 am
" NFP civil opinions today (1): In the Matter of the Supervised Administration of the Estate of Martha Wakefield, Deceased, Cinda Bartley v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:04 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T [2008] EWCA Civ 199; [2008] WLR (D) 91 “A supervision order made pursuant to s 31 of and para 6 of Sch 3 to the Children Act 1989 had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:11 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Olumba, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 408 (20 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Incorporated [2008] EWCA Civ 192 (19 March 2008) Jurkowska v Hlmad Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 231 (19 March 2008) T (a child) v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 199 (19 March 2008) Heath & Hampstead Society, R (on the application of) v Vlachos &… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:08 pm
The APA has just selected the hundreds of clinicians and scientists who will develop the DSM-V. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 3:06 pm
The necessary intention is an intention to possess, not necessarily an intention to exclude the paper owner, Lodge v Wakefield MCC [1995] 2 EGLR 124. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 4:50 am
The Second Department affirmed the dismissal of the complaint as against defendant Cushman & Wakefield, in Vignapiano v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Johns, MI 48879-2423 Phone: (989) 224-0333 (V/TTY); (800) 274-7426 (Toll Free) E-mail: matr@edzone.net Web: http://www.cenmi.org/matr Michigan Telework Loan Fund C/O U.C.P. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
Family Voices members are paid staff within the Title V agency, providing information and support on health concerns to families around the state. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 1:18 am
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. [read post]
