Search for: "Walk v. Ohio Supreme Court" Results 121 - 140 of 404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2018, 3:13 am by Orin Kerr
The Nebraska Supreme Court recently handed down a new Fourth Amendment decision, State v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The Trump administration took the matter to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Ninth Circuit got it wrong. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The Supreme Court has mentioned in passing that the Eleventh Amendment does not afford “local school boards” immunity from suit, Missouri v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 11:47 am by Scott Bomboy
This distinction between public high school and college students comes from a 1969 Supreme Court decision, Tinker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am by MBettman
” Justice DeWine, Majority Opinion On February 7, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Koprivec v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:41 am by SHG
Ohio Supreme Court ruling, has crashed. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am by Priscilla Smith
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio that limited factual disclosures serve the state’s interest in protecting the public from misleading and deceptive commercial speech. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Supreme Court denied certiorari in Christopher Anthony Floyd v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am by MBettman
” Justice O’Donnell, to Carol Thomasson’s counsel On November 21, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Charles W. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am by MBettman
” Justice French On October 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case Mark Schwartz, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Kathleen Schwartz, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am by MBettman
” Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for the Putative Father On June 21, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of In the Matter of: The Adoption of P.L.H., 2107-0173. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
To that end, the court walks through a number of statements made by Donald Trump and his associates, both before and after the inauguration, to establish this improper purpose. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
And I think that is a benefit in public interest law, where not only are you engaging in some high-level constitutional theorizing, but also representing and having to relate to folks from all different walks of life. [read post]