Search for: "Waring, Appeal of" Results 121 - 140 of 471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2013, 2:26 pm by Larry Munn
A decision from the Federal Court of Appeal, Iwasaki Electric Co. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 4:04 am
DCFS:Don't you just love the way Judge Shepherd frames his opinions, especially when he is trying to make a point about narrow statutory construction or the limited role of the judiciary:By this appeal, the Department invites us to expand the definition of the "environment" in which a child "lives"â€â [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:12 pm by Larry Munn
  Notwithstanding additional evidence filed on appeal, the Federal Court agreed, noting the similarity of the wares and services, and that the only difference between the Applicant’s mark, CANNABIS CULTURE SHOP, and the Opponent’s mark, CANNABIS CULTURE was the use of the word “shop”, which was not in itself inherently distinctive. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:44 pm
A U.S. appeals court recently ruled it is unlawful to import and sell copyrighted works created outside the United States without permission from the copyright owner. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
No correspondingly adapted description has been filed during the appeal proceedings. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:40 am
That's the word from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which found that a judge had gone too far by ordering longtime infomercial-pitchman-of-incredibly-dubious-wares Kevin Trudeau to spend a month in the pokey. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:57 am
Every so often the IPKat reads an appeal against conviction for criminal trade mark infringement that he just knows is going to be hopeless. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:06 pm
Smart & Biggar, on appeal to the Federal Court from a decision of the Registrar  is a further illustration. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:25 am by Larry Munn
On appeal, the Court found that “vibe” may no longer be inherently distinctive, but through continuous use it had become suggestive of the Opponent’s magazine, something the Board had acknowledged in its decision. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:33 pm by Paul Levy
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has now held that the right of public access cannot be so easily evaded. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Larry Munn
In a recent decision of Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal, Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 5:32 pm
Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Limited et al the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal with costs noting that the test for granting an interlocutory injunction had been clearly set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in RJR-MacDonald. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
It then considers how these were applied in civil actions in detinue and in criminal appeals of theft for the recovery of money. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Canadian Court of Appeal looked to settle this point after a first instance decision sometime in late 2015.The case of Vancouver Community College v. [read post]