Search for: "Warner Music, Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2016, 2:08 pm
Warner/Chappell Music Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:09 am
TRO-Ludlow Music, Inc. reserves all rights under the United States Copyright law in connection with this usage. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am
Bertlesman Music Grp., 693 F. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:13 pm
In September, the judge ruled that Warner had not shown it had a valid copyright in the song. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
Cal. 2010); Warner Bros. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
TVEyes, Inc., 2015 WL 5025274 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
See Warner Bros. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
See Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
* C'MOn C'MOn - Music PublishingA group of researchers, industry and policy makers gathered at Birkbeck workshop to debate recent research on music publishing -- and Nicola was there for the most rock&roll IP blog ever.* Dreams are my reality: a new EU copyright event…and talking about rock&roll, here’s the brand new eLAWnora copyright event, which will take place on 14th January 2016 in London.* Brussels Court of Appeal: no exhaustion… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
This is what happened last week:* When words mean what they say: Bob Marley copyrights stay where they areKatfriend and occasional contributor Dorothea Thompson reports on BSI Enterprises Ltd & Another v Blue Mountain Music Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1151, a 18 November ruling of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, applying the principles of contractual interpretation in the context of a fairly complex music copyright assignments involving some the much-missed… [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:00 am
” BMG and Round Hill claimed that Rightscorp Inc had informed Cox of “hundreds” of repeat infringers. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:42 am
Entertainment Inc. and DC Comics Inc. over the rights for the acclaimed superhero is hading back to court. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:14 am
The verdict against Las Vegas-based Rimini Street Inc. and CEO Seth Ravin followed a two-week trial in U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:00 am
After years of litigation and undoubtedly hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees (perhaps more), the Court concluded that the lyrics to the song “Happy Birthday” were never actually transferred to Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., the current troll that had been forcing us all to sit through awkward and unsettling performances of “original” songs during birthday feasts at our favorite chain restaurants. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am
Summy, and ultimately to Warner/Chappell Music. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., No. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:46 am
Recently the Central District Court of California ruled that no copyright protection exists for the popular “Happy Birthday To You” song after several decades of dispute.[1] Marya, involved a class action suit against Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
” While making the movie, Warner/Chappell, a music publishing division of the much larger Warner Music Group, demanded a license fee of $1,500 to use the song in the documentary. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
” While making the movie, Warner/Chappell, a music publishing division of the much larger Warner Music Group, demanded a license fee of $1,500 to use the song in the documentary. [read post]
