Search for: "Washington County v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 1,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2012, 3:00 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
State Street Ann Arbor, Michigan (MI) 48198 (Washtenaw County) The Law Office of Kurt T. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Washington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:03 am by Conor McEvily
United States (which Nabiha also covered in yesterday’s round-up) garnered coverage from several major news outlets. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Adam Chandler
Plata and Citizens United v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am by INFORRM
Can they still do that when the President of the United States has confirmed the records’ existence via tweet? [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
In states that did not ban the sale of raw milk, some cities and counties did. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm by Kedar S. Bhatia
United States was filed with assistance from the ACLU. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
NOTE: This post discusses the second of two major rulings Friday in lower courts in Washington on campaign finance law, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s January decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Land into Trust)Ak-Chin Indian Community v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Land into Trust)Ak-Chin Indian Community v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:40 pm
    Wrote Whatley, "In interpreting the Full Faith and Credit Clause, the United States Supreme Court has held that '[a] final judgment in one State, if rendered by a court with adjudicatory authority over the subject matter and persons governed by the judgment, qualifies for recognition throughout the land," citing Baker v. [read post]