Search for: "Washington v. Barnes"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,032
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2020, 5:41 am
“Most women take the pills that end a pregnancy in its early stages at home,” the Washington Post’s Robert Barnes reports, “and U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that the court’s “customary summer lull” is nowhere to be found this year, and the rapid pace of consequential emergency orders is likely to continue into the fall. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
Following the House of Representatives’ recent approval of the Washington, D.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:13 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes writes that the request is “a last-ditch effort” to stop the wall’s construction, coming from opponents who say that, without the court’s intervention, “the Trump administration could simply run out the clock. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Washington Post Supreme Court correspondent Robert Barnes got that message, and led off his account of the decision with it:[Though] the rulings were a disappointment for those who hoped to see the president’s long-withheld financial records before November’s election, . . . the court’s more lasting message came in the first sentence of Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
According to Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, the Vance and Mazars rulings, taken together, delivered “a nuanced and likely landmark lesson on the separation of powers and limits of presidential authority. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:24 am
"Robert Barnes reports (at WaPo).ADDED: Here's what a wrote about the case — Chiafolo v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
” In an op-ed at the Washington Examiner, Rep. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “those who saw oral arguments in the cases now collectively known as Bostock v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[t]he … deeply divided order … still provides a guide for lower courts balancing government rules intended to preserve public health with parishioners’ constitutional religious rights. [read post]
27 May 2020, 3:51 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[t]he court left open the door for the administration[:] It said a new filing could be appropriate later after the case proceeded through lower courts. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
Yesterday the court issued a unanimous opinion in Opati v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 12:52 pm
Hawaii, reporter Robert Barnes aptly summarized the case in a pithy headline for the Washington Post: "In travel ban case, Supreme Court considers 'the president' vs. 'this president.'" The Court chose the former. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:30 am
In the 2017 case, State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
” At The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[a]t the Justice Department, whose attorneys will take part in nine of the 10 scheduled arguments, the pleas will be made to a speakerphone in the solicitor general’s conference room,” and the advocates “will still be wearing morning coats, the formal, traditional dress for government lawyers who argue before the court. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post (subscription required). [read post]
