Search for: "Washington v. California Department of Corrections " Results 121 - 140 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm by Pennsylvania Employment Lawyer
The Department of Defense requires defense contractors to set up procedures for identifying drug users, including random testing. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:30 pm
California Department of Corrections spokesman Seth Unger says new execution protocols the state submitted to a federal judge last year meet the standards the Supreme Court outlined in its ruling. [read post]
Department of Commerce Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) BSA The Software Alliance DIGITALEUROPE 1. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany,  heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit viola [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am by Suzanne Ito
• David also discusses the use of solitary confinement in California in this front page NYT article and in Virginia in this front page Washington Post article. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:30 pm by Kristin Bergman
California, Illinois, Michigan, Washington, and more have followed suit. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
” Fortunately, the Department of Treasury recently proposed regulations that provide guidance regarding how to calculate whether an ICHRA provides “affordable” coverage. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In the Term that concluded last month, Horne v. [read post]