Search for: "Washington v. Department of Homeland Security" Results 121 - 140 of 469
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Bailey DeSimone
Res. 280 of the 81st Congress, 2nd Session (private law), authorized the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments (now the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs) to conduct an unprecedented “investigation on a Government-wide scale of homosexuality and other sex perversion” (S. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” At the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Natasha Merle and Samuel Spital suggest that last week’s decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Judith Gaskell
The Chief Justice, John Roberts wrote the opinion for Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
At Jurist, Ryan Suto argues that Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s partial dissent in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm by Jeff Richardson
"  The other big decision this week was in the DACA case Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 am by Donna Bader
The decision relies on procedural errors, including the failure by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to provide an adequate reasons for terminating the program. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 9:52 am by Jack Goldsmith
Similarly, Congress has specified that the under secretary for management in the Department of Homeland Security shall serve as the acting secretary if neither the secretary nor the deputy secretary is available to exercise the duties of the Office of the Secretary. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
The INA provides that when the Department of Homeland Security finds that an alien has illegally reentered the United States after having been removed, the prior order of removal is reinstated from its original date. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ImmigrationProf Blog, Kevin Johnson and others weigh in on Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:59 am by Andrew Appel
  The IHR Clinic also provided the court with scientific reports, a US Department of Homeland Security report, and a letter from the US House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
His decision followed the recommendation of Congress’s attending physician, Brian Monahan, who warned against recalling members of Congress in light of worsening numbers of coronavirus infections in Washington, D.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that “[l]ast August, the Department of Homeland Security tightened” the public charge rule, but “[i]n January, the Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote along conservative-liberal lines, allowed the … rule to take effect while the case moved forward”; “New York Attorney General Letitia James said Monday the high court should reconsider that decision in light of the pandemic. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Washington Post (subscription required), Laurene Powell Jobs worries that “if the Supreme Court allows the Trump administration to terminate DACA” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The New York Times, Bill Aseltyne and others weigh in on Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni looks at a recent letter to the court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Ariane de Vogue reports at CNN that “[u]ndocumented immigrants who work as health care providers are asking for their efforts fighting the coronavirus to be taken into consideration as the Supreme Court considers the Trump administration’s bid to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program,” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]