Search for: "Waters v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 9,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
EPA over whether wetlands are “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 6:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Briefs filed by the Tribe and the United States to obtain summary judgment on the water districts’ equitable defenses asserted in response to the Tribe’s claim for a declaration of its federally reserved rights to groundwater. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:54 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the case of Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 2:57 pm
Delaware [case backgrounder; merit briefs], 134, Orig., to revisit a century-old water boundary dispute between the two states. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm by ktidgren
On February 19, 2019, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in a Clean Water Act (CWA) case with far-reaching implications for many industries, including agriculture. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:59 pm by Keith Garner and James Rusk
The controversial rule, which redefines which water bodies qualify as “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act, was issued by the EPA and U.S. [read post]
United States, which established water rights for the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine people when the federal government created a reservation for them. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:43 pm
  But this Ninth Circuit opinion from today hits extraordinarily close to home.It's a putative class action against USA Water Polo -- the governing body for water polo in the United States -- that alleges that USA Water Polo didn't do anything to stop its players from getting put back into games after they'd suffered a concussion. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 2:19 pm by James Rusk and Keith Garner
But the agencies also said they intend to conduct a separate rulemaking to promulgate a new definition of waters of the United States that will consider the principles outlined in Justice Scalia’s plurality opinion for the Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
Special Master Thompson concluded that, since the Compact does not guarantee any state a set volume of water from the Yellowstone or its tributaries, a state making more efficient use of the water it draws does not violate the Compact. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:51 pm
(U.S.S.C., May 22, 2017, Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]