Search for: "Waters v. State of Alabama"
Results 121 - 140
of 316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 1:45 pm
The painful sting of tear gas and the piercing sounds of guns from Alabama State troopers turned a peaceful protest in Selma organized by Dr. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
A further seven states unhelpfully said their answers cannot be relied upon as guidance by taxpayers (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, and New Mexico). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Back to the negotiating table: Designing a Tribal-State compact for Alabama. [read post]
CAFA’s Local Event Exception Does Not Constrain the Event or Occurrence to a Discrete Moment in Time
12 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
” International Paper relied on Allen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
And a federal judge in Nebraska, in Waters v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
Alabama 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
It also has echoes in the attempts of some in state legislatures to criminalize dissent in new and creative ways. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
Alabama and Bethune Hill v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:22 am
Dissent: I’m pretty sure the government of Alabama has access to guns. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:30 am
Griswold v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
As a result, HDOH ordered this product embargoed (not to be sold, purchased, or consumed) throughout the state, and the temporary closure of all Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Alabama 16-595 Issues: (1) Whether Alabama’s advisory-jury death-sentencing scheme, which is in all relevant aspects the same as the Florida scheme reviewed in Hurst v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
§ 1369(b)(1)(F), the portion of the Clean Water Act’s judicial review provision that requires that agency actions “in issuing or denying any permit” under Section 1342 be reviewed by the court of appeals, to decide petitions to review the waters-of-the-United-States rule, even though the rule does not “issu[e] or den[y] any permit” but instead defines the waters that fall within Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:09 pm
V., Margolis, H. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
Alabama and Brookhart v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
The petitioner in Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]
