Search for: "Webber v. Webber" Results 121 - 140 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 11:07 am
The case of Webber v Webber, 56 So.3d 822 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) makes it clear that the modification is effective, retroactive back to the date of filing the petition for modification, and not retroactive to the circumstances which give rise to the modification. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:28 am by INFORRM
Stein and Milo are partners at Webber Wentzel attorneys and are writing A Practical Guide to Media Law. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:20 pm
The answer to that question was clearly provided for in the case of Webber v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:01 am by tortsprof
The Legal Intelligencer reports on a variety of issues raised by the plaintiffs in a post-trial motion challenging a defense verdict in Webber v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Stein and Milo are partners at Webber Wentzel attorneys and are writing A Practical Guide to Media Law. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm
The IPKat has since received these thoughts from Dr Philip Webber (Dehns), which he is happy to share with his readers: "Following the issuing of the recent stem cells decision from the CJEU (Brüstle v Greenpeace, C-34/10), opinions are still sharply divided as to the correctness of the decision. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:18 am by INFORRM
Dario Milo, is a partner at Webber Wentzel attorneys in Johannesburg, where he specialises in media law. [read post]