Search for: "Weinstein v. Weinstein " Results 121 - 140 of 599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
Because of a trial in progress, Judge Weinstein, along with state judge (Justice Helen Freedman), attended an ex parte private luncheon meeting with Dr. [read post]
20 May 2021, 6:08 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Thursday, May 20, 2021 Editor's Note: Gail Weinstein is senior counsel, and Philip Richter ;and Steven Epstein are partners at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“”[E]ither retention of bills without objection or partial payment may give rise to an account stated” (Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Waters, 13 AD3d 51, 52 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 11:56 am by admin
  Nonetheless, the assault on causation has been picked up by Professor Alexandra D. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Helweil v Karambelas  2021 NY Slip Op 00260 Decided on January 19, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department shows how courts place a very high premium on paying attorney bills. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm continue to serialize my forthcoming UC Davis Law Review article What Cheap Speech Has Done: (Greater) Equality and Its Discontents; you can read the Introduction, but in this post I'm talking about how "cheap speech" has brought back criminal remedies for libel. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 161-162 [1st Dept 2005].) [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:53 pm by Evan Schwartz
  For example, the California Supreme Court ruled in Liberty Surplus Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:41 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A recent decision from Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok, Weinstein v RAS Prop. [read post]