Search for: "Weintraub v Weintraub" Results 121 - 140 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2010, 10:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Weintraub was absent, and did not vote.) [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:46 pm
In August of 2010, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in Caro v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In an order dated December 10, 2019, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the defendant’s filing of ethics complaints was absolutely privileged (see Wiener v Weintraub, 22 NY2d 330, 331-332). [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
  “Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
  “Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Simser, 35 AD3d 1054, 1056 [2006]; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254 [1991]). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
Shield, 24 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), and approveed the decision in Weintraub v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
Weintraub, A Map Out of the Personal Jurisdiction Labyrinth,28 U. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The First Amendment does not protect public employees from adverse employment decisions based on communications they make pursuant to their official duties, see Weintraub v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm
It also directed the plaintiff to submit statements of attorneys' fees and costs incurred so that sanctions could be awarded.Just last week, the District of Maryland in Weintraub v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:31 am
§512(c)(3)(A)(v)). [read post]