Search for: "Wells v. Roper"
Results 121 - 140
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
I did pretty well on probation. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:50 am
Like the school district lines in Milliken v. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:17 am
The case is State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:47 am
SB9 would not have existed without Roper v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm
Romley v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:26 am
Given the dearth of overt consultation of foreign law after some criticized the Court's reasoning in Roper v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:15 pm
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court held in the case Roper v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
See Roper v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Roper, 14-6873, a capital case that asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
Legislators have accepted that as to other common carriage obligations; they might be willing to accept it here as well. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:55 pm
But it is nothing like a guarantee that the court will agree to hear it.On the other hand, the question of whether life without parole for juveniles is constitutional is the logical next step following the court's 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Kentucky Issue: Whether a juvenile under the age of eighteen at the time of his offense is entitled to a new sentencing hearing in light of Roper v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
” Those words from the Supreme Court in its Trump v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:39 pm
Louisiana (banning the death penalty for sexual assault of a child), and Roper v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:33 am
Louisiana (banning the death penalty for sexual assault of a child), and Roper v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Well, two out of three ain’t bad. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
