Search for: "Wells v. Social Security Administration"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 3:56 pm
Department of Homeland Security, a case challenging the legality of the CNVH immigration parole program. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
This combination includes: (i) the extraordinary value-creation opportunities within the company’s business model presented by AI; (ii) the complexity (and often opacity) of the underlying technology, especially when compared with existing data and information systems currently applied or under development by the company; (iii) the social, legal, compliance, ethical, and privacy issues that AI use presents – as well as its implications for international competitiveness… [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
This may well be one of the cases where doing right can be wrong. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Regarding data breaches, Transunion LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
The application was based on an alleged agreement between the parties and on the applicant’s constitutional rights to healthcare services, sufficient food and water, and social security. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
” Corporate and securities law – as well as companies and their leaders acting through lobbying and politics – also have major roles to play.[9] The proposed legislation in California is both legally solid and helpful for making climate progress. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Biden and the First Amendment on the Just Security Podcast. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
In a well-known 2007 case on climate change, Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:12 pm
(Broekman, supra., p. v). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:00 pm
Utah v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In Department of Education v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:02 am
Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) quoted from the 1919 decision in Schenck v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
But the absurdity of different aspects of the decision in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
But the absurdity of different aspects of the decision in Missouri v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
” The report explored the “opportunities as well as significant concerns for everyday life, health, work, and security. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:06 pm
In many cases, national security offices are empowered to make administrative punishment decisions but subject to the Administrative Punishments Law (Article 67). [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
Foreigners and foreign organizations "shall abide by its laws, and shall not endanger China’s national security, undermine social and public interests or disrupt social and public order" (Ibid.). [read post]