Search for: "Wells v. U.s.*" Results 121 - 140 of 9,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
This text explicitly references copyright and trademark law: the permission MoMA received from the copyright owners to reproduce an image of the work on their website, as well as the license acquired to reproduce the trademarked Campbell’s logo.[12] When the author entered the text prompt, “tomato soup cans in the style of Andy Warhol,” DreamUp outputted a series of images evoking the iconic Campbell’s cans and logo, even though the author did not input… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
It is accordingly important to understand the legal and policy framework governing this authority, as well as the history of its use. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm by Dennis Crouch
It is well settled that this does not constitute invention. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Thus, you still have important responsibilities to put guardrails on this scenario as well. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Matter of Aguilar Hernandez is a victory for noncitizens seeking to terminate removal proceedings on the basis of a defective NTA, but it is interesting for another reason, as well – it represents one of the rare instances in which the BIA has cited Kisor v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]