Search for: "Wells v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2016, 1:38 pm by Holland & Hart
Noting that representative data is not an appropriate means to overcome the absence of a common employer policy that applies to all class members, per its 2011 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
It would seem that his IP did not play a major role in his thinking as he applied his staunch conservatism to a variety of subjects.Against that background, this Kat found particularly interesting Justice Scalia's decision in the case of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court’s order serves as another reminder that, even after Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In addition to converting their class certification rulings into class action settlements with higher values and pay-outs, plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:27 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On appeal, Tyson Foods argued that plaintiffs’ use of averaging constituted impermissible “trial by formula” under Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:48 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices’ criticism of “trial by formula” came four years ago in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Turning to DSW’s argument that the employee failed to mitigate damages, the court found that she put forth compelling facts tending to show that she conducted a thorough job search from 2009 through 2012, worked at Wal-Mart at a lower paying job for a while, and again conducted a thorough job search after she left Wal-Mart. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2015 WL 5173060, No. 2:14–CV–2234 (E.D. [read post]
Despite the Supreme Court’s rulings against plaintiffs whose claims are too dissimilar, such as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]