Search for: "White v. York et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm
Rep. 6. [3] Id. at 7, 11. [4] Id. at 7. [5] Stephen Choi, et al., Cornerstone Research and New York University Pollack Center for Law & Business, SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries—Fiscal Year 2017 Update 3 (2017). [6] Id. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:18 am
See Singer, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Lipton and Laura Schmidt, both associates at the White & Williams law firm. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Lipton and Laura Schmidt, both associates at the White & Williams law firm. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Farrow et al, “Addressing the Needs of Self-Represented Litigants in the Canadian Justice System – A White Paper Prepared for the Association of Canadian Court Administrators” (27 March 2012) at 31, online: <http://www.cfcj-fcjc.org/sites/default/files/docs/2013/Addressing%20the%20Needs%20of%20SRLs%20ACCA%20White%20Paper%20March%202012%20Final%20Revised%20Version.pdf>. [8] See: Jennifer Bond, David Wiseman and Emily Bates, “The Cost of… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:37 am
The current deadline for the President to respond to the second amended complaint in CREW et al., v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:57 am
LG Corp., et al., No. 5:16-cv-05206, complaint (N.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Matsuda, Mari J. et al., Words That Wound (1993). [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:06 am
Gedney Association, et al v City of White Plains, 2017 WL 600519 (NYAD 2 Dept. 2/15/2017)Filed under: Access to Government, Current Caselaw - New York, Uncategorized [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:24 am
Games-Perez and U.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:42 am
State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
Center for Social Change, Inc. et al v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:10 pm
Since Harry Reid et al. have established the precedent that the rules on filibusters can be changed by a simple vote of a majority to ignore the rules, neither is very likely.With neither a Senate majority nor the White House, Democrats would be better off distinguishing between all-weather originalists and conservative judicial activists. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
Officials reportedly spoke with the White House on March 11, 2014, according to Tom Mashberg at The New York Times, discussing "fast action on [US import] restrictions. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 3:20 pm
Desmond et al. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:39 pm
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al. (151633/14) and Lohan v. [read post]
