Search for: "Williams v. CCHS" Results 121 - 140 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2017, 7:55 am by Joy Waltemath
Finally, the court found that Aetna, the administrator of FedEx’s short-term disability plan, did not breached its fiduciary duty under ERISA when it reported to FedEx that the employee filed a disability claim for substance abuse (Williams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
While his relationship book addressed an issue of public concern, the appeals court determined that the school district’s interest in ensuring effective delivery of counseling services outweighed his speech interest (Craig v Rich Township High School District 227, December 3, 2013, Williams, A). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), but also affirmed the trial court’s ruling that a now-defunct constructive discharge claim notice requirement in D.C. law was inapplicable to the present case regardless of whether the underlying conduct occurred while the notice provision was in effect (Williams v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Family Dollar Stores, Inc., No. 1:07-CV-1262-TWT-CCH, 2007 U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Family Dollar Stores, Inc., No. 1:07-CV-1262-TWT-CCH, 2007 U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome… [read post]