Search for: "Williams v. Correctional Officers" Results 121 - 140 of 1,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
COUNSEL Law Offices of Carcione, Cattermole, Dolinksi, Okimoto, Stucky, Ukshini, Markowitz & Carcione, Joseph W. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:37 am
During this arrest, officers seized the cell phone from Herrera. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
HONAN A jury convicted Donald William Honan of one count of lewd conduct (Pen. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Starks, First Circuit: Appellant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm after a police officer stopped him in a car his son had rented. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Williams & Anor v Hinton & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1123This, and please bear with me here, was an application for leave to appeal a Circuit Judge’s trial judgment. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Williams & Anor v Hinton & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1123This, and please bear with me here, was an application for leave to appeal a Circuit Judge’s trial judgment. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:49 am by SHG
District of Colorado Judge William Martinez in Doe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:54 am by Paul Venard
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit appellate decision; the case is Bland v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:07 am by Jon
It took until 1812 for the case to make it to the Supreme Court, by which time the issue was so settled that prosecution counsel didn't even bother to show up in court, and Justice William Johnson, Jefferson's first appointee to the Supreme Court, writing for a unanimous Court, rightly decided that defense arguments were correct, and that there was no authority for common law crimes. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:54 am by Paul Venard
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit appellate decision; the case is Bland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]