Search for: "Woodward v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am by John Elwood
Blessing, No. 13-169 (fourth relist), involving a racially conscious class-certification order, and Woodward v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
United States, and perhaps implicating the twice-relisted Woodward v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Meanwhile, possible relist Woodward v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
  Question: This is your first book and you had the honor of having Alice Mayhew – the senior editor at Simon & Schuster who was the editor for the likes of Jonathan Alter, Harold Holzer, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Walter Isaacson, and Bob Woodward, among others – as your editor. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
This vignette takes place after the oral argument in the Watergate tapes case (United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
Essays on the Compensation Act 2006 and Human Rights Act 1998 bring the current state of the interplay between tort, politics and legislation to the forefront. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:24 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Page & Anor v Hewetts Solicitors & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 805 (15 June 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Mabanga v Ophir Energy Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1589 (QB) (15 June 2012) London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB) (15 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Dalriada Trustees Ltd v Woodward & Ors [2012] EWHC 21626 (Ch) (15 June 2012) High Court (Family Division) The… [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm by Buce
The case may be read as a pendant to Dartmouth College v Woodward, decided just  18 years before, in which the court barred the State of New Hampshire from rewriting the charter it had granted to Dartmouth College. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Woodward has disputed Jeff Himmelman’s report. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:34 am by Russ Bensing
”  The 9th Circuit based its decision on Jackson v. [read post]