Search for: "Word v. Jones" Results 121 - 140 of 1,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Parliament could achieve a contrary result by using the clearest possible words. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 6:05 am
For this third and penultimate entry in my series of posts on Jones v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am by CMS
In this post, Tim Sales, a partner in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, and Hannah Jones, who works in the Tax team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Haworth) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 25. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:35 am
  Jones Day.Which makes me initially think that Jones Day might be messing with us as well.My initial reaction to the lawsuit was the same as most people's. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
Imputation involves concluding what the parties would have intended, whereas inference involves concluding what they did intend. ([126])And so, Jones v Kernott [2011] UKHL 53. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by INFORRM
These varieties are not mutually exclusive: the same words may carry both varieties of imputation. [33(i)] He suggested three possible sub-varieties of personal defamation: a) Imputations as to what is “illegal, mischievous, or sinful” in Pollock CBs’ phrase (in Clay v Roberts (1863), 8 LT 397, cited in Sim v Stretch). [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:56 am
Alden is a partner resident in the Cleveland office of Jones Day. [read post]