Search for: "York v. Fields"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 2:45 pm
On Tuesday, New York passed the Reproductive Health Act, finally bringing state law in line with Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm
The case, People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:45 am
Co-authors Lydia Webb and Rusty Tucker Until Monarch Midstream v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:58 am
The majority opinion in Scurry v New York City Hous. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
New York recently took a step in the right direction when Gov. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
(NY Murder Conviction Overturned for Denial of ID Expert) As previously reported, last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 4:23 am
The case- People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
Today the justices granted review in the case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 8:45 am
New York. finding that the Clause does not apply at sentencing, and the 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:24 am
The SCOTUS Blog case file for Perry v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:01 pm
In Young v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
However, a 1979 case called Hackbart v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:46 pm
N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
The settlement was announced in Raza v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:16 pm
Since I wrote about United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
New York (1980). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:43 pm
The New York Philharmonic 1. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 6:28 am
Papakosmas v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
This is a proceeding wherein the court is faced with the issue of whether or not its discretion as authorized in People v Kalin to deem a misdemeanor complaint charging a drug-related offense to be an information in the absence of a field test or laboratory analysis violate the defendant's constitutional right to due process. [read post]
