Search for: "Zuckerman v Zuckerman"
Results 121 - 140
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
–CDM v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co. v Copfer, 48 NY2d 871, 873).Here, Lexington met its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562) by submitting, inter alia, an affirmation of an AIGDC attorney who had handled the Eason claim. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 3:38 am
Attorney Disqualified Under Advocate-Witness Rule in LLC Dissolution Case Zuckerman v Shaknovich, Short Form Order, Index No. 604957/15 [Sup Ct Nassau County June 27, 2016]. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
Zuckerman to Close Miami Office in Wake of Exodus to Carlton Fields
Daily Business Review
Zuckerman Spaeder is closing its Miami office following the defection of four out of five partners to Carlton Fields. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:42 am
” In reliance on the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 1985 holding in Zuckerman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
" In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
The opponent of a summary judgment motion must present admissible evidence that is sufficient to raise an issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:16 am
In fact, until the Tenth Circuit's recent decision in Golan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 2:48 pm
In 2018, the Supreme Court held in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
In respect to the other phases of the Appellate Division's power to lessen or suspend the sentence in this case, an affirmative answer is found, among others, in People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am
In opposition to the motion, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the continuous representation doctrine applied to toll the statute of limitations (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
, 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altshcul 2022 NY Slip Op 34430(U) December 30, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 104202/2011 Judge: Kelly A. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
”); Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:12 am
This Court affirmed (see Healy v Spector, 287 AD2d 541). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
This Court affirmed (see Healy v Spector, 287 AD2d 541). [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:51 am
This Court affirmed (see Healy v Spector, 287 AD2d 541). [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:49 am
This Court affirmed (see Healy v Spector, 287 AD2d 541). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
